<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subliminal Messages: Domainers Gone Wild Over Chef Patrick&#8217;s Controversial Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/</link>
	<description>The Best Domaining Blog on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave C</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>September 20th, 2009

 As someone who is a still-performing  AVN Hall of Fame Adult &quot;actor&quot; (search my stage name– Dave Cummings!), and just happens to own thousands of adult and Non-adult domains, I’m finding it hilarious that some folks are questioning this issue.

I wonder if this week will surface any more supposedly religious American politicians who preach one thing but hypocritically “partake”?

Dave C.


September 20th, 2009&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 20th, 2009</p>
<p> As someone who is a still-performing  AVN Hall of Fame Adult &#8220;actor&#8221; (search my stage name– Dave Cummings!), and just happens to own thousands of adult and Non-adult domains, I’m finding it hilarious that some folks are questioning this issue.</p>
<p>I wonder if this week will surface any more supposedly religious American politicians who preach one thing but hypocritically “partake”?</p>
<p>Dave C.</p>
<p>September 20th, 2009&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babalooey</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>babalooey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>Nice counterpoint re: subliminal advertising and using the movie &quot;The Little Mermaid&quot; as an example --I remember when the hoopla hit on that cover.

However, if Disney WAS going for subliminal advertising with a background of penises, WHO were they trying to &quot;subliminally&quot; sell to?  Why would phallic towers sell, and if so, what was their market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice counterpoint re: subliminal advertising and using the movie &#8220;The Little Mermaid&#8221; as an example &#8211;I remember when the hoopla hit on that cover.</p>
<p>However, if Disney WAS going for subliminal advertising with a background of penises, WHO were they trying to &#8220;subliminally&#8221; sell to?  Why would phallic towers sell, and if so, what was their market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidney Raphael</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidney Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>Puleeeze, try not to use fancy words you don&#039;t know the meaning of. &quot;Subliminal&quot; is the first example.

The &quot;limen&quot; part of the word means &quot;threshold.&quot; The &quot;sub&#039; we all know means &quot;below.&quot;  Something is &quot;subliminal&quot; when it falls below the usual ability to perceive. 

The classical subliminal messages when psychologists started playing with this idea were flashed on the screen for mere mini-fractions of seconds. They were &quot;subliminal&quot; because it usually takes a bigger fraction of a second for the visual apparatus (eye, brain, etc) to perceive something. It surprised psychologists when some of these &quot;subliminal&quot; messages made an impression on the viewer despite being flashed only a teeny, tiny time.

When an object has more than one meaning it is not &quot;subliminal.&quot; It is ambiguous. &quot;Ambi&quot; implies two. Two or more meanings, in this case.

A tower can be a tower. But it might also be a symbol for a penis. Maybe. Perhaps. If the viewer happens to interpret it that way. If the viewer isn&#039;t in the mood to interpret a picture of a tower as a penis symbol, nothing in the world will convince that viewer of that implied meaning.

Just think of the way you live your life. How many times a day do you see objects or pictures that maybe, possibly, under some circumstances could be interpreted as penises. We see things that could be interpreted as penises thousands of times a day. It is definitely not the case that people are helpless to defend themselves against interpreting things that look like penises as penises. Of the thousands of times a day that you see objects that could be interpreted as penises, I&#039;ll bet you interpret them as penises maybe once or twice a day. Now, pictures of penises or actual penises get interpreted as penises most of the time. But not other objects that maybe, possibly could be...

Making &quot;subliminal&quot; a magic word that creates the impression that human beings automatically do things one way and one way only is nonsense.

As Freud once said, &quot;It may be a penis symbol, but it&#039;s also a good cigar.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puleeeze, try not to use fancy words you don&#8217;t know the meaning of. &#8220;Subliminal&#8221; is the first example.</p>
<p>The &#8220;limen&#8221; part of the word means &#8220;threshold.&#8221; The &#8220;sub&#8217; we all know means &#8220;below.&#8221;  Something is &#8220;subliminal&#8221; when it falls below the usual ability to perceive. </p>
<p>The classical subliminal messages when psychologists started playing with this idea were flashed on the screen for mere mini-fractions of seconds. They were &#8220;subliminal&#8221; because it usually takes a bigger fraction of a second for the visual apparatus (eye, brain, etc) to perceive something. It surprised psychologists when some of these &#8220;subliminal&#8221; messages made an impression on the viewer despite being flashed only a teeny, tiny time.</p>
<p>When an object has more than one meaning it is not &#8220;subliminal.&#8221; It is ambiguous. &#8220;Ambi&#8221; implies two. Two or more meanings, in this case.</p>
<p>A tower can be a tower. But it might also be a symbol for a penis. Maybe. Perhaps. If the viewer happens to interpret it that way. If the viewer isn&#8217;t in the mood to interpret a picture of a tower as a penis symbol, nothing in the world will convince that viewer of that implied meaning.</p>
<p>Just think of the way you live your life. How many times a day do you see objects or pictures that maybe, possibly, under some circumstances could be interpreted as penises. We see things that could be interpreted as penises thousands of times a day. It is definitely not the case that people are helpless to defend themselves against interpreting things that look like penises as penises. Of the thousands of times a day that you see objects that could be interpreted as penises, I&#8217;ll bet you interpret them as penises maybe once or twice a day. Now, pictures of penises or actual penises get interpreted as penises most of the time. But not other objects that maybe, possibly could be&#8230;</p>
<p>Making &#8220;subliminal&#8221; a magic word that creates the impression that human beings automatically do things one way and one way only is nonsense.</p>
<p>As Freud once said, &#8220;It may be a penis symbol, but it&#8217;s also a good cigar.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>Anonymous - Thanks for your comment!

Patrick - Subliminal advertising is not always hidden. For example if you&#039;ve ever seen the Corona commercial where you see a corona sitting on a table, then a hot babe walks through the scene, that&#039;s a form of subliminal advertising. It&#039;s obvious, but it&#039;s still considered subliminal advertising. And that&#039;s exactly what Chef is doing!

Chris - I appreciate the comment. Chef loves his job, and he does it better than most. It&#039;s just a matter of his questionable move to &quot;expose&quot; a girl in his domain news video. I am not picking sides though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous &#8211; Thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>Patrick &#8211; Subliminal advertising is not always hidden. For example if you&#8217;ve ever seen the Corona commercial where you see a corona sitting on a table, then a hot babe walks through the scene, that&#8217;s a form of subliminal advertising. It&#8217;s obvious, but it&#8217;s still considered subliminal advertising. And that&#8217;s exactly what Chef is doing!</p>
<p>Chris &#8211; I appreciate the comment. Chef loves his job, and he does it better than most. It&#8217;s just a matter of his questionable move to &#8220;expose&#8221; a girl in his domain news video. I am not picking sides though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>Once again, if the domain business isn´t sexy than we are in the wrong industry, that vid is creativity mixed with sex appeal ;)
Patrick is doing a great job, not many people are doing that kind of domain blogging style like him and with that he contributes much more to the domain industry than others can believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, if the domain business isn´t sexy than we are in the wrong industry, that vid is creativity mixed with sex appeal <img src='http://www.dnunderground.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Patrick is doing a great job, not many people are doing that kind of domain blogging style like him and with that he contributes much more to the domain industry than others can believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>&quot;While (Chef) Patrick’s video showed a very obvious subliminal (advertising) message&quot;

Hi,

I don&#039;t think there was anything &quot;subliminal&quot; about Chef Patrick’s very
voluptuous co-host.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While (Chef) Patrick’s video showed a very obvious subliminal (advertising) message&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there was anything &#8220;subliminal&#8221; about Chef Patrick’s very<br />
voluptuous co-host.  <img src='http://www.dnunderground.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/09/20/subliminal-messages-domainers-gone-wild-over-chef-patricks-controversial-video/comment-page-1/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=276#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>While I love Chef&#039;s blog, I definitely think it made his blog look dirty, more like a porn blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love Chef&#8217;s blog, I definitely think it made his blog look dirty, more like a porn blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

