<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prestige Pricing: Tricking the Consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/</link>
	<description>The Best Domaining Blog on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-23</guid>
		<description>There is a great story about the guy who launched grey goose vodka - instead of charging a bit more than absolut (the most expensive mainstream vodka at the time) he said screw it - i&#039;m going to charge twice as much. And it worked like a charm. 

I disagree about Ruth&#039;s Chris - their steaks are pretty good (not the best though). If they charged $40 for a crappy steak nobody would go.

But a domain isn&#039;t vodka or a burger. It doesn&#039;t have prestige when buying or owning it. No more than a few dozen people will ever know that it is a rick latona domain. 

Rick sells all sorts of names, but he doesn&#039;t sell crap names for $10,000. So yes, he has a better chance than you or I selling a name for $1,000 - but it&#039;s not because the name is worth $200 and his name adds $800....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great story about the guy who launched grey goose vodka &#8211; instead of charging a bit more than absolut (the most expensive mainstream vodka at the time) he said screw it &#8211; i&#8217;m going to charge twice as much. And it worked like a charm. </p>
<p>I disagree about Ruth&#8217;s Chris &#8211; their steaks are pretty good (not the best though). If they charged $40 for a crappy steak nobody would go.</p>
<p>But a domain isn&#8217;t vodka or a burger. It doesn&#8217;t have prestige when buying or owning it. No more than a few dozen people will ever know that it is a rick latona domain. </p>
<p>Rick sells all sorts of names, but he doesn&#8217;t sell crap names for $10,000. So yes, he has a better chance than you or I selling a name for $1,000 &#8211; but it&#8217;s not because the name is worth $200 and his name adds $800&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Well, now that everyone else has been commenting a lot, I feel I need to put in my better two-cents.

I feel bot sides have compelling arguments here. For example: I think a McDonald&#039;s Burger is much better than some burgers sell at more upper class restaurants. Just for fun :)

But really, we are comparing apples to oranges here. The domain name market itself is based a lot on speculation. If a domain is said to be premium by the experts, then yes, it is premium and deserves big money. However, this system is very, very flawed. Why?

Because the &quot;experts&quot; said that LQAL.com would be worth $xxx+. Now, some people are still pushing for the LLLL.com market to pump up, but, as of right now, experts made domainers believe that type of domain to be worth $xxx+ where now you&#039;d be lucky to get $xxx. The main point is here, sometimes the experts appraise wrongly.

Moving on, if we take Rick Latona to be an expert, whatever he says is good, IS good. Many people take his word to be domain name law. There&#039;s more to this case though, what he says is premium, other experts are saying is premium. Luckily, it is not a unilateral body governing over the domain name world, but multiple experts. To throw another loop into this, Rick Latona still can sway the market one way or another with his newsletter.

Knowing this, prestige pricing does take a huge effect in selling domains because  they are based off speculation. There are no set prices for any domain, which makes selling even harder. Although Rick Latona doesn&#039;t &quot;trick the consumer&quot; he still has the ability too, and unbeknown to us, may have already.

(For those of you who don&#039;t know what I imply there is this: The market, just like LLLL.com&#039;s, sways so easily, it may just be one whole scam which will eventually crash. Who knows :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now that everyone else has been commenting a lot, I feel I need to put in my better two-cents.</p>
<p>I feel bot sides have compelling arguments here. For example: I think a McDonald&#8217;s Burger is much better than some burgers sell at more upper class restaurants. Just for fun <img src='http://www.dnunderground.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But really, we are comparing apples to oranges here. The domain name market itself is based a lot on speculation. If a domain is said to be premium by the experts, then yes, it is premium and deserves big money. However, this system is very, very flawed. Why?</p>
<p>Because the &#8220;experts&#8221; said that LQAL.com would be worth $xxx+. Now, some people are still pushing for the LLLL.com market to pump up, but, as of right now, experts made domainers believe that type of domain to be worth $xxx+ where now you&#8217;d be lucky to get $xxx. The main point is here, sometimes the experts appraise wrongly.</p>
<p>Moving on, if we take Rick Latona to be an expert, whatever he says is good, IS good. Many people take his word to be domain name law. There&#8217;s more to this case though, what he says is premium, other experts are saying is premium. Luckily, it is not a unilateral body governing over the domain name world, but multiple experts. To throw another loop into this, Rick Latona still can sway the market one way or another with his newsletter.</p>
<p>Knowing this, prestige pricing does take a huge effect in selling domains because  they are based off speculation. There are no set prices for any domain, which makes selling even harder. Although Rick Latona doesn&#8217;t &#8220;trick the consumer&#8221; he still has the ability too, and unbeknown to us, may have already.</p>
<p>(For those of you who don&#8217;t know what I imply there is this: The market, just like LLLL.com&#8217;s, sways so easily, it may just be one whole scam which will eventually crash. Who knows <img src='http://www.dnunderground.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Media</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think I would actually be more likely to pay full asking price to an average domainer instead of Rick.  Because he is such an experienced domainer and talented negotiator, I would be expecting to get the short end of the stick with him every time.  Rick does not under-sell a domain.  With you, I would feel like there was at least a slim chance I could give myself the upper hand and come out with a bargain.  I understand what you&#039;re saying and that is definitely possible for some people, just wanted to say how I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I would actually be more likely to pay full asking price to an average domainer instead of Rick.  Because he is such an experienced domainer and talented negotiator, I would be expecting to get the short end of the stick with him every time.  Rick does not under-sell a domain.  With you, I would feel like there was at least a slim chance I could give myself the upper hand and come out with a bargain.  I understand what you&#8217;re saying and that is definitely possible for some people, just wanted to say how I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh P</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-17</guid>
		<description>DnUnderground, this is absolutely the case.  If Angelina Jolie owned an ordinary dresser which she purchased for $500 and she chose to auction it off to eBay, how much do you think it would sell for?  $1000?  $2000?  Probably closer to $10,000 if you&#039;d ask me.  Now, consider Ron James of NamePros.  He might not be as famous worldwide as Ms. Jolie, but his capacity to sell a $30-reseller domain for $100 (I have seen this occur several times) is a microcosm of Ms. Jolie&#039;s situation.  When you purchase a domain from Ron, you&#039;re also buy privilege to brag, &quot;Wow, I just bought a name from THE Ron James!&quot; There&#039;s a certain satisfaction that acquiring the product of famous, trustworthy person&#039;s mental processes entails.  Same goes for intangible items famous people might offer.  How much would you pay to spend an hour with Barack Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DnUnderground, this is absolutely the case.  If Angelina Jolie owned an ordinary dresser which she purchased for $500 and she chose to auction it off to eBay, how much do you think it would sell for?  $1000?  $2000?  Probably closer to $10,000 if you&#8217;d ask me.  Now, consider Ron James of NamePros.  He might not be as famous worldwide as Ms. Jolie, but his capacity to sell a $30-reseller domain for $100 (I have seen this occur several times) is a microcosm of Ms. Jolie&#8217;s situation.  When you purchase a domain from Ron, you&#8217;re also buy privilege to brag, &#8220;Wow, I just bought a name from THE Ron James!&#8221; There&#8217;s a certain satisfaction that acquiring the product of famous, trustworthy person&#8217;s mental processes entails.  Same goes for intangible items famous people might offer.  How much would you pay to spend an hour with Barack Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Well, I (respectfully) disagree with Name Media, here is why:

The technique described here is not only about pricing, but making the prospect believe a story about what they are going to purchase. If that premium domain tells a story that is compelling enough for the end user/reseller it will sell! Same thing with a McDonald&#039;s burger, it tells the story of it being cheap, when in reality you spend about the same amount of money buying a meal than you would at a restaurant.

If the fancy restaurant serves crappy burgers, but it has a compelling story of &quot;status&quot; or &quot;expense&quot; the people will most likely return there for those same reasons. 

Then again, it all comes back to creating the correct marketing strategy for a domain. Here is what I do to create a story:
1. Make a nice logo for the domain: Invest $30 - $50 on a nice logo to bring out the potential in the name. Keep in mind most resellers see thousands of domains, having a logo will make it stand out.
2. Think of ways to develop the domain: If you are charging $20k for a name, adding your valuable opinion on how this premium domain can be utilized to recuperate that investment. Although sometimes the buyer will have their own ideas.
3. Invest in a press release: Again, it&#039;s all about telling the story and reaching more people. Not only will you gain links from the PR websites, but you will appeal to your end buyer by using the keywords their business targets. 
4. Develop the domain: If the domain is about &quot;insurance leads&quot;, why not invest $300 on a nice site that will capture business, produce residual income for you, and add even more value to the end user?

Keep in mind I&#039;m not talking about crappy domains, but premium keywords that would sell for less, like Admin stated on the OP.

Anywho, great post!

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I (respectfully) disagree with Name Media, here is why:</p>
<p>The technique described here is not only about pricing, but making the prospect believe a story about what they are going to purchase. If that premium domain tells a story that is compelling enough for the end user/reseller it will sell! Same thing with a McDonald&#8217;s burger, it tells the story of it being cheap, when in reality you spend about the same amount of money buying a meal than you would at a restaurant.</p>
<p>If the fancy restaurant serves crappy burgers, but it has a compelling story of &#8220;status&#8221; or &#8220;expense&#8221; the people will most likely return there for those same reasons. </p>
<p>Then again, it all comes back to creating the correct marketing strategy for a domain. Here is what I do to create a story:<br />
1. Make a nice logo for the domain: Invest $30 &#8211; $50 on a nice logo to bring out the potential in the name. Keep in mind most resellers see thousands of domains, having a logo will make it stand out.<br />
2. Think of ways to develop the domain: If you are charging $20k for a name, adding your valuable opinion on how this premium domain can be utilized to recuperate that investment. Although sometimes the buyer will have their own ideas.<br />
3. Invest in a press release: Again, it&#8217;s all about telling the story and reaching more people. Not only will you gain links from the PR websites, but you will appeal to your end buyer by using the keywords their business targets.<br />
4. Develop the domain: If the domain is about &#8220;insurance leads&#8221;, why not invest $300 on a nice site that will capture business, produce residual income for you, and add even more value to the end user?</p>
<p>Keep in mind I&#8217;m not talking about crappy domains, but premium keywords that would sell for less, like Admin stated on the OP.</p>
<p>Anywho, great post!</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acro</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Acro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-14</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about connections and persuasion skills. The burger/Latona example is a failure, in my opinion. The secret to bigger sales - other than having better domains (which means paying more $$$$ to get them in the first place) is to ASK for higher prices from potential buyers. If you don&#039;t ask, you don&#039;t get :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about connections and persuasion skills. The burger/Latona example is a failure, in my opinion. The secret to bigger sales &#8211; other than having better domains (which means paying more $$$$ to get them in the first place) is to ASK for higher prices from potential buyers. If you don&#8217;t ask, you don&#8217;t get <img src='http://www.dnunderground.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleDevil</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Good post.  And good examples using the domainers to help explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  And good examples using the domainers to help explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the response Ross!

As for Domain Media, I totally see where you are coming from. The premise I am basing my article off of is debatable. I understand that. The reason I say people will pay more for a domain name from Rick Latona then from me is he is a HUGE name in the industry, so a user will trust him to sell him a good domain, a lot more then they would trust a smaller guy like me. Same goes with Ruth&#039;s Chris. I understand the Ruth&#039;s Chris/McDonald&#039;s example was a lot more debatable then the basis of my article, so I understand your objection to that. I was just trying to get the point out to my viewers and get the whole point easily understood.

Make anymore sense to you? Hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the response Ross!</p>
<p>As for Domain Media, I totally see where you are coming from. The premise I am basing my article off of is debatable. I understand that. The reason I say people will pay more for a domain name from Rick Latona then from me is he is a HUGE name in the industry, so a user will trust him to sell him a good domain, a lot more then they would trust a smaller guy like me. Same goes with Ruth&#8217;s Chris. I understand the Ruth&#8217;s Chris/McDonald&#8217;s example was a lot more debatable then the basis of my article, so I understand your objection to that. I was just trying to get the point out to my viewers and get the whole point easily understood.</p>
<p>Make anymore sense to you? Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Media</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with the premise of your post or the conclusion you drew from it.  Ruth&#039;s Chris is known as a top steak house because their food is really good.  If the day they first opened their doors they charged $15 for a crap burger, they would have no repeat business and no reputation.  Likewise, if I went in and got served a crap burger even after they had established a strong reputation, I wouldn&#039;t go back.  The burger wouldn&#039;t magically taste better because I heard they had good food.

Likewise, Rick&#039;s domains don&#039;t look good because he has been in this business a long time and knows what he is doing.  They ARE good... because he has developed impeccable instincts for this business.  He sells domains for more money because he has better domains, not because he has a better reputation.  He sells domains for more money because he has a good gut for determining the value of a domain, and he has a knack for negotiating and sticking to his guns.  That is, after all, why he has the reputation.

If you two tried to sell the same exact domain, and he got more money for it, that is simply because he was not willing to sell for as low as you were.  I doubt buyers are throwing 3x as much money at him just because he is Rick Latona.  There is no substitute for skill and talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with the premise of your post or the conclusion you drew from it.  Ruth&#8217;s Chris is known as a top steak house because their food is really good.  If the day they first opened their doors they charged $15 for a crap burger, they would have no repeat business and no reputation.  Likewise, if I went in and got served a crap burger even after they had established a strong reputation, I wouldn&#8217;t go back.  The burger wouldn&#8217;t magically taste better because I heard they had good food.</p>
<p>Likewise, Rick&#8217;s domains don&#8217;t look good because he has been in this business a long time and knows what he is doing.  They ARE good&#8230; because he has developed impeccable instincts for this business.  He sells domains for more money because he has better domains, not because he has a better reputation.  He sells domains for more money because he has a good gut for determining the value of a domain, and he has a knack for negotiating and sticking to his guns.  That is, after all, why he has the reputation.</p>
<p>If you two tried to sell the same exact domain, and he got more money for it, that is simply because he was not willing to sell for as low as you were.  I doubt buyers are throwing 3x as much money at him just because he is Rick Latona.  There is no substitute for skill and talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dnunderground.com/03/07/prestige-pricing-tricking-the-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnunderground.com/?p=190#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Great article, very A.P. economics themed. One of the better ones here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, very A.P. economics themed. One of the better ones here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

